A Video of the 19 Year Old That Got Shot by the Baby in Walmart Huntersville North Carolina

(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Prophylactic in Significant Persons." Just as agonizing as the information is the fact that the report authors plainly sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth virtually vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attending by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double bank check all the math. In doing and so, we were able to ostend two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained beneath) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this written report was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly prophylactic. But the report data really show quite the oppose.

Hither's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table iv from the study, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their tertiary trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their beginning or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the tabular array to encounter this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their kickoff or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week marking. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the commencement 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their outset or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions amidst these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

Information technology is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known every bit "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not accept possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their tertiary trimester, by definition.

Thus, the written report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters.

Put another way, information technology is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the beginning time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame charge per unit.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make information technology appear that vaccines are rubber for significant women. In reality, they seem to exist killing more than iv out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this information gear up. (It's a small set of 127 pregnant women, so nosotros'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in gild to get a more than clear moving-picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and l limes, with a scientific discipline study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number fifty. They mistakenly divide l into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because it's 50/100.

But the other l pieces of fruit can't maybe be included because they're limes, non lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellowish. That'due south the correct reply.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the tertiary trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since significant women aren't time travelers, they can't go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either tin't exercise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core hope: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the globe around u.s.a..

Yet when 4 out of v meaning women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous ballgame charge per unit is just 12.six%. Why? Because they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most probable.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same mistake in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here'southward another report he co-authored: "Adverse events afterward Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify whatever new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID."

Merely is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this aforementioned study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time ane author was found to have fabricated systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they exist addressed and corrected. We can't only accept bad math and call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean fourth dimension, it's clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first xx weeks (at least, co-ordinate to the small data fix we have so far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) testify that covid vaccine spike proteins directly assail reproductive organs such equally the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine good and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on significant women is "shameful." You lot can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may collapse by 3.2 1000000 over the next year, in the USA solitary, if every significant woman is vaccinated during the start 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is existence called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and scientific discipline have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine manufacture is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land direction arbiter once characterized human children as an "ecology take a chance."

This is a state of war. A bioweapons assault. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the unabridged human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity'south destruction.

Larn more in today'southward mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

menardwineve.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post